logo
cover
cover
commettee-1
commettee

Why study gender equality?

Achieving gender equality is a desirable social goal globally

Gender Equality was made part of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights in 1948

The Constitution of India not only guarantees women equality but empowers the state to enforce measures to achieve equality through positive discrimination

In 1979, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). India is a signatory to CEDAW

The Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing in 1995, asserted women’s rights as human rights and committed to specific actions to ensure respect for those rights

Achieving gender equality is Sustainable Development Goal 5, to be attained by 2030 by all countries in the world

gender_equality

Why study Hindi cinema/ Bollywood?

Media and Entertainment industry in India is INR2.1 trillion (US$26.2 billion)

Film industry is the fourth largest in this sector

Media is an important actor in the promotion of gender equality

Portrayal and Visibility of women, men and genderqueer individuals are important for achieving gender equality in the Media and Entertainment industry.

Hindi_cinema
logo

GENDER BALANCE:

ONSCREEN IN HINDI CINEMA
Quantitative study done as part of the TISS study ‘Lights, Camera and Time for Action: Recasting a Gender Equality Compliant Hindi Cinema’

School of Media & Cultural Studies

Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

June 2023

gender-balence

Revealing Gender on Screen

What did we study?

The on-screen representations of women, men and LGBTQIA+ persons,

and

Women present off screen as crew members and in other parts of the film ecosystem

Why did we study?
  • To study the representations of women, men and LGBTQIA+ persons in Hindi cinema
  • To quantitatively assess on 15 parameters the state of gender representation and constructions

1930 characters studied

Box office toppers

Top

25 ( 1503 Characters )

films from the year 2019

2019 was the last year before pandemic-related lockdowns, when the study commenced in 2021

Women-centric films

10 ( 427 Characters )

10 women-oriented films between 2012-19

Major conversations on gender-based violence and #MeToo between 2012-19

Gender Distribution of Characters

popcorn-box

1930
total speaking and named characters studied

Cis-Female

BOX ofFICE TOPPERS

23.3%

WOMEN-CENTRIC FILMS

36%

LGBTQIA+

BOX ofFICE TOPPERS

0.3%

WOMEN-CENTRIC FILMS

7%

Cis-Male

BOX ofFICE TOPPERS

76.4%

WOMEN-CENTRIC FILMS

57%

Cis-heteronormative males and cis-heteronormative females were coded as males and females, respectively

Where the sexual orientation of cis-gender males was presented in the film as gay or bisexual, or cis-gender females as lesbian or bisexual and individuals distinctively presented as transmen or transwomen or non-binary, they were coded as LGBTQIA+

While this term conflates gender and sexuality, it has been used as the numbers of all these taken together are relatively small

Types of Characters in Films

Lead
hero

The lead propels the story forward

Co-lead
hero

The co-lead plays a role of lesser importance than the lead but also propels the story in association
with the lead

Romantic Co-lead
hero

The romantic co-lead plays a role of lesser importance in the story and has a romantic association with the lead

Romantic Interest
hero

A romantic interest role is shorter in length and of limited influence

Other
hero

All the other roles those are supportive in nature in a film with a name and/or dialogue

Box office Toppers: Gender Stereotyped Roles

Lead

Lead
  • 15%
  • 0%
  • 85%

Co-lead

Co Lead
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 100%

Romantic Co-Lead

Co Lead
  • 90%
  • 0%
  • 10%

Romantic Interest

Romantic Interests
  • 86%
  • 0%
  • 14%

Women-Centric Films: Role Reversal of Characters

Lead

Heroine
  • 57%
  • 43%
  • 0%

Co-lead

Co Lead
  • 60%
  • 0%
  • 40%

Romantic Co-Lead

Co Lead
  • 25%
  • 25%
  • 50%

Romantic Interest

Romantic Interests
  • 71%
  • 10%
  • 19%

What are We Seeing Here?

Type of Role
Box-office Toppers
Cis-Female
Cis-Male
LGBTQIA+
Lead
Lead
Blue_Tick
Co Lead
Co-Lead
Blue_Tick
Romantic Co Lead
Romantic Co-Lead
Blue_Tick
Romantic Interests
Romantic Interest
Blue_Tick
Type of Role
Women-Centric Films
Cis-Female
Cis-Male
LGBTQIA+
Lead
Lead
Blue_Tick
Blue_Tick
Co Lead
Co-Lead
Blue_Tick
Blue_Tick
Romantic Co Lead
Romantic Co-Lead
Blue_Tick
Romantic Interests
Romantic Interest
Blue_Tick

Demography of the Characters

age

Age

The age of characters was enumerated based on visual representation
and dialogues

The 21-45 year age group is the dominant age group among all genders

Women-centric films are more inclusive with children, teens of all genders, and the elderly playing characters
in the films

Caste of Characters

super-30 articale-15
super-30 articale-15
popcorn-box

Caste in films is observed through the last names of characters, caste-based occupations, caste symbols, household rituals, caste pride dialogues, domestic practices and interactions

popcorn-box

Characters were enumerated into two categories (Dominant Caste and
non-Dominant Caste)

The majority of characters in box-office toppers and women-centric films are shown as belonging to dominant castes (92%)

Lead characters belong to non-dominant castes only if the film is on caste

Religion of characters

religion

Religious identities in films are represented through visual symbols, dialogues, music, religious rituals, religious pictures, idols, places of worship, clothing and jewellery

Majority of the characters playing the leads, co-leads, romantic co-leads and romantic interests in both box-office toppers (79%) and women-centric films (64%) are Hindu

Disability

disability

Disabilities are coded according to the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 which provides for all categories of disabilities

Only 0.5% of characters are shown
with disabilities

People with disabilities are shown to attract sympathy or as comic relief in box office topper films

LGBTQIA+ characters in box-office toppers are not shown with disabilities

All the characters with disabilities in box-office topper films are male

Heterosexual female characters in box-office toppers and women-centric films are not shown with any physical disability

Only one women-centric film presents the lead character with disabilities

Employment

Employment

Employment was inferred from the visuals, dialogue, display of income-earning work or references to employment and earning

Employment

Among the women characters:
42% of women are employed in Box office toppers and
33% are employed in women-centric films

Figures higher than the national figures for women’s employment but stereotypical, sexualised and also often trivialised

LGBTQIA+ characters are shown to be in employment

Women professionals (doctors, nurses, teachers) are represented voyeuristically

Employment is shown as double-edged. Families complain about women’s commitment to their jobs. Managers complain about women’s family responsibilities

GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYED CHARACTERS

Box Office Toppers

Cis-Female

16%

LGBTQIA+

0.4%

Cis-Male

83.6%

Women-Centric Films

Cis-Female

23%

LGBTQIA+

1%

Cis-Male

76%

Types of occupations of Men and Women

Journalist Nurse

Women

Media, Care work, Medicine

military politician crime

Men

Military, Police, Politics & Crime

Barely intersecting worlds of work

9 in 10 men are in decision making roles

Gendered work roles

None of the LGBTQIA+ characters are in decision making roles

Only 1 in 10 women are in decision making roles

Stereotyped work profiles

Joining the dots: The story we see

icon

Empowerment and agency of women in films is expressed in terms of personality traits rather than their rightful place in society and in the world of work

icon

Characters in big cities have careers/aspirations. Characters from small towns, where a lot of contemporary films are set, are not afforded such representation

icon

Even the ‘new economy’ narratives sidestep substantive representation of women in employment and in decision-making positions

Relationship status

message-box
1

Characters in films are shown as being in committed romantic or marital relationships. This is an indication of how characters are imagined within a
normative framework

message-box
3

Only 21% of all characters are in committed romantic or marital relationships in Hindi films

message-box
3

For each of the genders, the distribution is - 40% of female characters, 28% of LGBTQI+ characters and 14% of
male characters are in committed relationships

message-box
4

Women-centric films, which also have more family and gender relations-oriented subjects have a higher percentage of females, males and LGBTQI+ in
committed relationships

Appearance of characters

Attractiveness & Skin Colour

Three indicators were used to categorise the appearance of characters: attractiveness, skin colour and body shape

Attractiveness was studied as the extent to which the character was the recipient of verbal and nonverbal indications that communicate physical desirability

Appearance_main

Women across all films receive higher verbal and non-verbal comments/hints about physical attractiveness

60%
of women characters
have fair skin,
0nly 35% of male characters
are fair-skinned

55%
of Male characters are of ‘wheatish’ complexion

Darker skin tones are the least preferred

Body Shape

Majority of women are thin in box office toppers and women-centric films. However, the percentage is lower in women-centric films

In both types of films, male characters are of medium body shape

Appearance

Love Your Body

Clothing

Clothing in films is a shorthand to indicate the class, caste, marital, religion, ethnic status and attitude (traditional or modern) of the characters. In the case of women characters, it is about their sexuality and virtue, as well

cloth-bg

Women who play key roles wear Western and Indian clothes

Female characters are seen predominantly in Indian clothing such as the sari, salwar kameez and lehenga

Male characters are seen in only Western clothing such as Western-style trousers, denim jeans, western-style shirts
and t-shirts

Greater expression of ‘modern’ identities in women-centric films compared to box-office topper films

LGBTQIA characters are seen more in western clothing than in Indian clothing in both types
of films

Sexualisation & Objectification

so1

More women than men wear sexually revealing clothing

so3

Objectification was studied by observing dialogues, actions and cinematic angles

so2

More female characters are treated as sex objects by other characters, regardless of the type of film

so4

Women-centric films that cover themes of sexism, sexual harassment and gender relations slip into objectification through voyeuristic
camera angles

Who initiates intimacy?

More male characters initiate intimacy

Expression of intimacy is higher in women-centric films

What is the Broad Picture We See ?

Box Office Toppers
Public-Domain

Public domain focus

War politics leisure

War, politics & leisure

Women-Centric Films
Private-Domain

Private domain focus

love sexuality gender-relation

Love, sexuality & gender relations

broad-icon

Violence in films outstrips love and romance

broad-icon

More female characters are involved in intimacy but male characters initiate it

broad-icon

Consent-seeking in intimacy is still fraught with violence
and misogyny

broad-icon

Women-centric films explore structures of patriarchy and question them. couple of films also highlighted marital rape

broad-icon

Films continue to demarcate men as ‘bad men’ and ‘good men’

broad-icon

Films that explore sexual intimacy do not address contraception or safe sex

broad-icon

LGBTQIA+ characters are sexualised in Box office films

Violence: Forms & Targets

Violence of different forms and on different characters is endemic to films

Perpetrators of physical and verbal violence were categorised into initiators and retaliators

voilence-targets
Physical Violence

A majority of male characters and male leads are shown as initiating physical violence in box-office topper films

Few female leads are shown as initiating physical violence in a few box-office films

Targets of Physical Violence

More male characters are targets of physical violence than female characters in box office topper films

More female characters are targets of physical violence than male characters in women-centric films

target-phisical-bg

Verbal Violence

Perpetrators of verbally violent acts use loud or soft words to attack and intimidate other characters

verbal-violence
message-box

Verbally violent males who target other males are a majority in films

message-box

More female characters are shown as initiating verbal violence targeted against women in
women-centric films

Sexist Humour

Sexist humour normalises inequalities and gender discrimination

Sexist jokes and statements are made in films to intimidate or compliment women and gender-nonconforming individuals

“औरत जैसी” (Like a woman) continues to be used as a mockery for queer characters or non-aggressive male characters

“चूड़ी पहन के” (wearing bangles) to brand a man as a ‘beta male’ exists in films

Male characters crack most of the sexist jokes in films

Female characters rarely call out sexism

Female characters that resist sexist humour are portrayed as aggressive women or wild women

Bechdel Test

Bechdel-Wallace Test examines gender bias and representation in any media. A film is said to pass the Bechdel test if there is at least one scene where two named women characters talk to each other on topics other than a man

Bechdel_Test
message-box-white

Only 36% of box-office films passed the Bechdel test while 100% women-centric films passed the Bechdel test

message-box-white

More female characters in women-centric films had conversations about their lives, careers, domestic responsibilities, mental health and aspirations compared to women in box-office topper films

Sexual Harassment & Response

The legal framework provided by Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code was used to study the various acts of sexual harassment that were committed by characters

Sexual_harassment

Box office topper films show more instances of sexual harassment compared to women-centric films

Stalking is the most common form of sexual harassment. In a few films, this is shown as the pathway to seeking a woman’s love

Ignoring the incident
is the most common response

Male leads respond with violence and aggression if ‘their women’ are
sexually harassed

Women who call out sexual harassment are blamed for inviting it

Big picture

picture-rill-white

Box-office topper films with few exceptions are largely
out-bound (politics, society, action trillers, terrorism, etc) and women-centric films are in-bound (family, gender, interpersonal relationships, sexuality, etc)

There are more men than women on screen in films

The majority of films have male leads and women as romantic interests

bad-pic-1.png
picture-rill-white

LGBTQI+ characters are getting visible but are stereotyped

Films have characters that are young in age, able-bodied, upper caste and Hindu

Women characters are fair, thin, sexualized, objectified and subject to sexist jokes

bad-pic-2.png
picture-rill-white

Women in employment hold stereotyped jobs and rarely have
decision-making power

Consent is still inadequately dealt with

Women-centric films reverse this casting and also are more diverse

bad-pic-3.png
women-off-screen

Women off-Screen As
Crew And In The Ecosystem

Women behind the screen

4,131

female crew for 35 films

For every woman actor on screen there are
8 female crew members behind the screen

26,328

male crew for 35 films

Whereas, for every male actor on screen there are 19 male crew members behind the screen

For every 1 woman in the crew
there are 6 men in the crew

11

Women as a percentage of the crew
are higher in women-centric films
compared to box office topper films

WOMEN DIRECTORS ARE INCLUSIVE

womwn-directors

Women-centric films have more female crew at 15% compared to 13% in the box-office toppers

Women-centric films had double the number of female heads of department at 6% compared to the 3% in the box-office toppers

WOMEN CREW LIMITED TO FIVE DEPARTMENTS

WOMEN CREW LIMITED
Box Offfice Toppers

48.2%

  • VISUAL EFFECTS 20.2%
  • PRODUCTION 8.2%
  • MUSIC 7.7%
  • COSTUME 4.6%
  • DISTRIBUTION 5.7%
Women-Centric Films

44.1%

  • VISUAL EFFECTS 9.6%
  • PRODUCTION 13.8%
  • MUSIC 9.0%
  • COSTUME 6.2%
  • DISTRIBUTION 5.6%
Tech women new entrants:

There are software technology skilled women contributing to Box–office films that use animation and visual effects in war films and sci-fi films

MISSING WOMEN

Film_Governence
Women are thinly spread across 37 Film Departments
Least women credited in these Departments
BOX Office Toppers
  • 1% CINEMATOGRAPHY
  • 1% SOUND
  • 0.4% EDITING
  • 0.2% LYRICS
  • 0.2% SCRIPT
Women-Centric Films
  • 1.2% ACTION
  • 1.1% EDITING
  • 0.8% SCRIPT
  • 0.7% SOUND
  • 0.2% LYRICS

Women In Film Governance

ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES:
14% - Only 4 female Ministers of Information and Broadcasting in 75 years
14% - Only 4 female Chairpersons of the Central Board of Film Certification
(CBFC) in 72 years
29% - Female Board members in CBFC in the last 13 years

Women Award Winners

Women Award Winners.png
41%
Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award

(2010-2020, www.imdb.com)

31%
Screen Award Winners

(2010-2020, www.filmfare.com)

28%
Filmfare Award Winners

(1991-2017, www.filmfare.com)

13%
National Film Award Winners

(2009-2019, https://dff.gov.in)

12%
Dadasaheb Phalke Award

(1969-2018, https://dff.gov.in)

Joining the dots

Women working in crews outnumber women on screen

Women oriented films have more women in the crew and as heads of departments

Women are under-represented in core filmmaking departments

Women are far and fewer in the film eco-system - Unions, associations, Boards and receive fewer awards each year

We see small changes happening but these need to be more conscious and with clear strategy to close the gender gap

Acknowledgements

Data Coding Agency

Pixights Consulting, Mumbai

Report Design

Adosys Consultancy Pvt Ltd., Kolkata

Funding Support

US Consulate Mumbai

Research Team

  • Dr Lakshmi Lingam

  • Dr Sunitha Chitrapu

Research Assistants

  • Ms Diksha Sindram

  • Ms Asmita Srivastava

Acknowledgements for Data Access

  • Sridhar Rangayan for access to the film Evening Shadows
  • Crew Data

  • Cine & TV Artistes Association (CINTAA) Honorary General Secretary, Mr Amit Behl
  • Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) President, Mr BN Tiwari
  • The Sound Association of India (WIMPTSEA) Honorary General Secretary, Mr Anjani Srivastav
  • Producers Guild of India CEO, Mr Nitin Tej Ahuja

Ecosystem Data

  • Film and Television Institute of India - Shri. Sandeep Shahare, Director
  • Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute -
    Shri Himansu Sekhar Khatua, Director

Acknowledgements

TISS, Mumbai

Dr Shalini Bharat, Director, TISS

U S Consulate Mumbai

Mr Mike Hankey, Consul General

Mr Robert Anderson, Cultural Affairs Officer

Ms Almitra Kika, Program Manager, Public Diplomacy

logo

Scripting Change

Women Screenwriters in Hindi Cinema
Qualitative study done as part of the TISS study ‘Lights, Camera and Time for Action: Recasting a Gender Equality Compliant Hindi Cinema’

School of Media & Cultural Studies

Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

June 2023

Why Women Screenwriters?

message-bx

Screenplay and dialogue writers have often been overlooked in India
in terms of visibility and acknowledgement

message-bx

Women screenwriters increasingly focus on gender roles in society

message-bx

Four screenwriters, three screenwriter directors and one film programmer/ screenwriting mentor were interviewed to understand their experiences of the industry

women-screenwritter

Pathways to the Profession

One out of the eight interviewed studied the Screenplay Writing course offered by FTII, Pune

Others either did a media course or switched to screenwriting from other media professions

pathways-to-the-profession

Pitching Scripts: Genre Trouble

screen-writter-message

“I was told by a leading producer
that you can't write about female friends. I remember a few years ago, I wrote a story about War. World War and the Indian participation in it.I mean there was no way I could get money to make it because nobody will trust me with it. Despite having done so much work they will trust a new guy to make a war film”

Multiple drafts of Scripts lead to Losing the Essence

screen-writter-message-2

“It was also suggested that why don’t I take a big male star as her co-star so that it could get funded, and it could see the light of day”

What is this pointing to?

Do we have critical numbers of women and queer scriptwriters

Do we have critical numbers of women producers who are able to green light projects by women screenwriters?

Is the film industry putting in place policies to have an equitable eco-system?

pointing
what-is-this-pointing-icon

Change this Script

Screenwriting Education and Development: Production companies need to invest in teaching screenwriting at par with international standards

More women and gender queer individuals in writer’s rooms of series and films to be encouraged by creating opportunities, lucrative remuneration and time to write to pitch and produce a script

More women as Producers to produce and green light scripts to change the male gaze

Anti-sexual harassment policies need to be in place to secure women and queer writers who engage with, pitch or workshop their projects with other crew members in offices or
in private spaces

Acknowledgements

Urmi Juvekar
Gazal Dhaliwal
Gauri Shinde
Nupur Asthana
Meenakshi Shedde
Nidhi Mehra
Rohena Gera
Rajat Dawar
Shilpa Phadke
Atika Chohan
Deepti D’Cunha
Paromita Ghosh
Sunitha Chitrapu
Nithila Kanagasabai

Research Team

Dr Harmanpreet Kaur

Assistant Professor,

School of Media & Cultural Studies,

TISS, Mumbai

Assisted by: Subhajit Sikder

Calling the Shots: Women Directing Hindi Cinema

Qualitative study done as part of the TISS study ‘Lights, Camera and Time for Action: Recasting a Gender Equality Compliant Hindi Cinema’

School of Media & Cultural Studies
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

June 2023

directors

Boxed In and Breaking out

In-depth interviews with 18 women directors

Senior most in 70’s and youngest in their early 30s

All interviews were done online between January 2022 and April 2023

boxed-in-and-breaking-out

Representation Question

screen-writter-message-2

What does it mean to be a woman director in the Hindi film industry?

screen-writter-message-2

What can be done to make both cinema and the sets more inclusive?

screen-writter-message-2

How can we address sexual harassment and the provision of infrastructure on the sets?

screen-writter-message-2

What has and has not changed in the Hindi film industry in terms of gender in the last twenty years?

‘Woman’ Director or Director?

Filmmaking led by women changes the gaze, making it more nuanced and representative

However, the ‘woman’ Director tag typecasts women film makers reducing their chances of getting funding

Finding finance for women-centric films by early career women directors is a challenge

Mentorship has a strong positive impact in increasing the number of women directors

women-director

Suggestions

suggetion
Infrastructure

Infrastructure: provide clean toilets, creches, POSH committees

Network_Building

Network building: to facilitate mentorship and sponsorship of early-career women directors

Hiring women: have a minimum percentage of women in every department

Female forward storytelling: Increase financial support for women-led narratives

Acknowledgements

Directors:
Alankrita Shrivastava
Anu Menon
Anusha Bose
Arati Kadav
Aruna Raje
Gauri Shinde
Jyoti Kapur Das
Leena Yadav
Mansi Jain
Nandita Das
Nupur Asthana
Reema Kagti
Reema Sengupta
Rohena Gera
Shazia Iqbal
Shikha Makan
Tanuja Chandra
Vijayeta Kumar

Research Team

Dr Shilpa Phadke, Professor
Ms Nithila Kanagasabai, Assistant Professor

School of Media & Cultural Studies,

TISS, Mumbai

Research assistance:
Ms. Srishti Walia
Ms. Nabeela Rizvi

TALKING BACK: CREATIVE AND
CRITICAL RESPONSES OF YOUNG
ONLINE MEDIA CRITICS

Qualitative study done as part of the TISS study ‘Lights, Camera and Time for Action: Recasting a Gender Equality Compliant Hindi Cinema’

School of Media & Cultural Studies
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai

June 2023

directors

Why Study Responses to Cinema?

slide_2
message-box

Audiences are an important part of the cinema ecosystem

message-box

Young online media critics are exemplars of ‘active’ audiences

message-box

Their social media conversations are important for the film industry to get feedback on film narratives and issues of representation

What did we study?

Interacted with young online media critics

Followed hashtag conversations

Mapped the diversity of conversations

boxed-in-and-breaking-out

What we found?

message-bx
1

Comments on cinema are made through text, memes, and mashup videos

message-bx
2

Humour and satire make commentary accessible

message-bx
6

Gender representation is discussed beyond the binary

slide-4
what we found
message-bx
5

Inclusive and intersectional view of gender

message-bx
6

Online communities are introduced to feminist and social justice vocabulary

message-bx
6

‘Nasty’ audiences - trolls and abusers negatively impact online conversations

What needs to be done?

In a heavily mediatised world young people need critical media education to deal with various kinds of media content and navigate social media safely

Beyond representation on and behind the screen, representation in front of the screen also matters. Women and non-binary folx need improved access to cinema

Conversations driving progressive change are being shutdown by trolls and abusers – film industry needs to build campaigns and actionable community guidelines

The government, film producers, distributors, and digital platforms can design special campaigns and events to promote women and non-binary audience participation

slide-5.png

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Gauri Jalan
Prathyush Parasuraman
Salva Mubarak
Shrishti Malhotra
Neha Shekhawat
Sonia Mariam Thomas
Sucharita Tyagi

Research Team

Dr Faiz Ullah,
Assistant Professor,
School of Media and Cultural Studies,
Tata Institute of Social Sciences
Assisted by:
Ms Nabeela Rizvi & Ms Asmita Srivastava

For feedback or any related communication write to : dean.smcs@tiss.edu outreachsmcs@gmail.com